![]() |
Original Picture |
While you can say this was just something the directors had to do to stay within the bounds of school education, every documentary I've seen so far has had obvious bias. After thinking about it a little, it isn't very surprising that documentaries are biased- they are supposed to show the person or group in the best light possible. So documentary "bias" (if you can call it that) isn't inherently a bad thing. I remember being awed at a History Channel documentary I watched of Augustus Caesar. However, after doing a little independent research I saw that a lot of the things he is accredited for happened because of someone else. The most prominent example I can think of that most people will know is one of Augustus' famous quotes "I found Rome a city of bricks and left it a city of marble" where he quite clearly is taking credit for Rome's bolstered economy (TQP). While its true that Rome certainly got richer while he was in power, this was mainly due to Julius Caesar's previous successful conquests in Gaul. Not to say Augustus wasn't important, but the documentary was obviously missing a few facts. Same thing with Thomas Edison, the film showed him as a brilliant businessman and thinker who brought wide-spread electricity to the modern world. However, his title of "Father of Electricity" is a stolen one. He subverted and used Nikola Tesla's ideas and innovations while simultaneously smearing his name. The reason why we can have those small and efficient power lines all around America is because of Tesla, yet he is given the boot in favor of Edison.
In the end, I think that's why I don't like documentaries- they don't tell the full story. I like to hear both sides of a story, and to hear about both the good and bad aspects of a famous person. I believe that learning about what struggles overcame a person and how they bounced back from them to end up on top again shows the person in a much brighter light than only learning about their achievements. Washington won an impossibly outnumbered revolution, Augustus isn't the sole reason Rome was able to expand her borders again, and Edison stole alternating current from Tesla. Every great person has faults, but it is a part of who they were and how they came to be the person that is so famous now that we have documentary films about them! We shouldn't hide these important facts just because they aren't as pretty as some others. To sum everything up, the reason I haven't seen many documentary films is because every one that I've seen has blatantly ignored important facts about the person the film was about; I don't like being told strictly one side of a story, I want to know the full and exhaustive story.
Works Cited:
- Washington, George. "George Washington on the Problems of the Militia." George Washington on the Problems of the Militia. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Sept. 2015. <http://www.shsu.edu/~his_ncp/Militia1.html>.
- Caesar, Augutus. "The Quotations Page: Quote from Caesar Augustus." The Quotations Page. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Sept. 2015. <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/24364.html>.
Ian,
ReplyDeleteNice post :) A lot of the documentaries we had to watch in high school were on the boring/biased end of the spectrum. Like you mentioned, these left a "sour taste" in your mouth and probably gave you a negative impression of documentaries. I think you would enjoy reading Alison's blog on this topic (http://alisonswritingcorner.blogspot.com/) because you two seem to have opposite view points. She is a fan of documentaries because she always learns something from each one. As I mentioned in my blog post, if you have Netflix, there's tons of topics to choose from including: biographical, crime, historical, international, military, music & concert, political, science & nature, social & cultural, sports, and travel & adventure. I think that maybe political documentaries just weren't your thing (they aren't mine either) but you might enjoy the social and cultural titles :)
Like yourself, I also get annoyed when documentaries do not address both sides of an issue. I think that the best documentaries do make an effort now to address both sides. After Tiller is the documentary I chose for our class project. It does a good job of addressing prolife and prochoice arguments. I think you would like it because the film did not seem bias and did not push the viewer to believe a certain way.
Hello Ian,
ReplyDeleteI have a similar background with documentaries. I have only watched a handful of documentaries and I only watched them because it was an in class assignment. And yes they were all boring as well. I never really thought about how documentaries could be bias but you bring up a good point. If a documentary is going to be made on a certain topic is should include full details and not just what they want people to know.